أنظمة حل المنازعات في كلاً من منظمة التجارة العالمية والمركز الدولي لتسوية المنازعات وأثرها على حقوق المستثمر الأجنبي "دراسة مقارنة"
مقالة الشريط الجانبي
-
تسوية منازعات الاستثمار, منظمة التجارة العالمية, الاستثمار, حقوق المستثمر
الملخص
ظهرت عدة آليات دولية لنظر مختلف منازعات الاستثمار، كآلية تسوية المنازعات
التابعة لمنظمة التجارة العالمية، والمركز الدولي لتسوية منازعات الاستثمار، إلاّ أنه
وبالنظر لوظائف آلية تسوية المنازعات التابعة لمنظمة التجارة العالمية، والمركز الدولي
لتسوية منازعات الاستثمار يظهر بأن هناك اختلافاً من الناحية العملية ومن حيث
الآثار وكلاهما يؤثّر على حقوق المستثمر، تسعى هذه الورقة العلمية إلى تقييم آلية
تسوية المنازعات في إطار هذين النظامين.
النص الكامل
المراجع
• Anastasiia Filipiuk, ‘Enforcement of ICSID Arbitration Awards and Sovereign Immunity’ (LLM short thesis, Central European University, April 2016).
• Andrew Mitchell in ‘International Trade Law and International Investment Law: Complexity and Coherence (Proceedings of the Annual Meeting)’ (2014) 108 American Society of International Law, 251.
• Antonio R. Parra, ‘The Enforcement of ICSID Arbitral Award’ (24th Joint Colloquium on International Arbitration Paris, November 2007).
• Bernd Ehle and Martin Dawidowicz, ‘Moral Damages in Investment Arbitration, Commercial Arbitration and WTO’ in Jorge A. Huerta-Goldman, Antoine Romanetti and Franz X. Stirnimann, WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2013).
• Christopher Gibson, ‘Latent Gounds in Investor-State Arbitration : Do International Investment agreements Provide New Means to Enforce Intellectual Property Rights ?’ in Karl P. Sauvant, Yearbook on international investment law & policy 2009-2010 (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010).
• Christopher Gibson, ‘A Look at the Compulsory License in Investment Arbitration: The Case of Indirect Expropriation’ (2010) 25 American University International Law Review, 358.
• Dan Sarooshi, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the World Trade Organization: What Role for Systemic Values in the Resolution of International Economic Disputes?’ (2014) 49 Texas International Law Journal, 14.
• Daniel T. Shedd, Brandon J. Murill and Jane M. Smith, ‘Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization (WTO): An Overview’ (2012) Congressional Research Service Report RS20088, 1.
• Joost Pauwelyn, ‘The Rule of Law without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus’ (2015) Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IHEID), 8.
• Martín Molinuevo, ‘Can Foreign Investors in Services Benefit from WTO Dispute Settlement?’ (2006) NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper No 2006/17.
• Mitsuo Matsushita, Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Petros C. Mavroidis and Michael Hahn, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
• Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, ‘Democratizing international dispute settlement: The case of trade and investment disputes’ (Center For International Environmental Law conference, Doha, 29th October – 1st November 2006) 2.
• Rafael Leal-Arcas, International Trade and Investment Law: Multilateral, Regional, and Bilateral Governance (Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2010).
• Stirnimann, WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2013) 273.
• Surya P Subedi, ‘International Investment Law’ in Malcom D. Evans, International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
• Thomas Sebastian and Anthony Sinclair, ‘Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement and Investor-State Arbitration : Contrasts and Lessons’ in Jorge A. Huerta-Goldman, Antoine Romanetti and Franz X.
• Yasuhei Taniguchi and Tamoko Ishikawa, ‘Balancing Investment Protection and Other Public Policy Goals: Lessons from WTO Jurisprudence’ in Julien Chaisse and Tsai-yu Lin, International Economic Law and Governance: Essays in Honour of Mitsuo Matsushita (Oxford: OUP 2016).